Archive for the ‘Hedge Funds’ Category

JM Advisors (Liquidity and Leverage)

October 22, 2009

John Meriwether announced that he planned to shut down JWM Partners and create his third hedge fund, JM advisors. Why people would invest with him is unfathomable. Clearly if Meriwether blew up twice in the past decade, he is very likely to do it again.

John Meriwether was part of the group of Nobel prize winners that created LTCM. Long Term Capital Management ironically traded short term strategy that scalped the price differences between two similar securities. This process is known as arbitrage.

Arbitrage occurs when prices of two similar securities trade at different prices. To use a simple example, let’s pretend that xyz stock trades in Europe at 10.45 USD and the exact same aecurity trades for 10.47 USD in Hong Kong. Abitrage firms would buy xyz stock in Europe and sell the same xyz stock in Hong Kong. Eventually if the process us is done correctly prices should reach 10.46 USD in both markets assuming normal market conditions.

The strategy while simplistic, works across many different asset classes (stocks, bonds , futures, derivatives). The problem is that the strategic relies on liquidity ( a topic discussed in the last post). We are assuming normal market conditions that might not always be available as we’ve seen in 2008-2009.

Another risk from this strategy is that since arbitage firms essentially scalping small profits here and there, it needs tremendous leverage for the firms to actually make a decent return. Most arbitrage firms will leverage up about 7-8 times their assets under management. LTCM reportedly used up to 25x leverage. JWM Partners reportedly used 10x leverage.

The problem with leverage is that when positions move against you, your prime broker (the financial institution that lent you the capital in the first place) will demand more collateral. If you don’t have any collateral to post, you have to liquidate positions immediately, this is known as puking. Many hedge funds puked starting from 2007-2009, selling securities left and right. Puking causes efficient markets to be inefficient and also shows the dangers of a highly levered strategy. A firm levered 25 times can only withstand a 4% hit against their portfolio before they are wiped out. The less leverage you use, the longer you are able to withstand irrational markets.

John Meriwether lost a tremendous amount of capital for LTCM investors as well as for the investors that invested in JWM partners (44% losses from 2007-2009). This strategy can be best described as picking up pennies in front of a steam roller. It will work most of the time until you get rolled over.

John Meriwether wiki profile:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Meriwether?wasRedirected=true

John Meriwether to start JM Advisors

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/331bae80-be93-11de-b4ab-00144feab49a.html?nclick_check=1

Does Andrew Hall deserve his 100m payday?

October 20, 2009

Andrew Hall deserves his 100m dollar bonus especially if it’s 20% of the gains he’s produced for his group. Let’s assume the Phibro unit produced 500m in trading gains per year for the past few years. Citi selling Phibro to Occidental Petroleum for 250m is a great deal for Occidental. To buy a business at less than what it makes annually is a great deal assuming that Phibro’s earnings are consistent.
Here are two examples of Phibro’s trading prowess. One example listed in the Time magazine article mentioned that Andrew Hall decided to buy gold when there was great uncertainty whether there would be global inflation or deflation. Hall’s move to go long gold was stance in an uncertain environment.
The second example shows the ingenuity of Hall’s group, when oil prices exhibited heavy contango last november (spot price was around 40 dollars and the 3 and 6 month oil futures were trading at 55 and 65 dollars respectively). Hall leased oil tankers with the capacity to hold 100m barrels of oil and performed an arbitrage few traders thought of doing. Hall purchased oil at 40 and stored it in the tankers and sold near term futures contracts that were priced much higher, instantly locking in the spread and in the process made his group 40m from the strategy.
The two examples from above are also good examples of asymmetric returns. Asymmetric returns have low downside and a big upside. For example, if a stock has priced in very high expectations, shorting the stock may yield asymmetric returns. If the stock performs as everyone so eagerly anticipates then the stock should not go up too much, however on the off chance that it disappoints, the stock should go down heavily than it would have gone up.
With a perfect 20/20 hindsight vision, Rimm reported earnings recently and missed, the stock dropped 15%. What percent would it have gone up of, if it met expectations? It’s hard to say but you can assume it would go up only 5-6%. A firm that can consistently find asymmetric trades in the market is a firm that will be able to earn high risk adjusted returns over time.
Phibro has proven itself as a savvy market speculator by taking on positions that few firms were willing to. Occidental Petroleum’s purchase of Phibro will allow them to compete with the Exxon Mobil’s of the oil industry. The deal once again is a great deal for Occidental Petroleum as long as they are able to retain Andrew Hall and his group.

Link to Time’s article on Phibro unit:

http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1930732,00.html